1 THE UNITARY FERMI GAS: A BENCHMARK CASE FOR MANY-BODY PHYSICS Haussmann/Rantner/Cerrito/Zw. PR A75, 023610 07 Enss/Haussmann/Zw. Ann. Phys. 326, 777 11 Enss/Haussmann arxiv:1207.3103 Schmidt/Rath/Zw. arxiv:1201.4310 Efimov physics
2 textbook model for fermionic superfluids BCS 57 Fermions with density n = k 3 F /3π2 and attractive two-particle interaction V (x) = ḡ δ(x) pairs form and condense at T c exp 1 ḡ N(0) T F what happens at infinite coupling g =?
scattering length in 6 Li gn(0) 2k F a/π 5 20 Energy [MHz] 0 10 0-10 Scattering length [a 0 ] -5 543 650 834 Magnetic Field [G] -20x10 3 3
4 Outline I) Unitary gas thermodynamics II) Viscosity and spin-diffusion III) Universality of the 3-body parameter in Efimov physics
5 The unitary Fermi gas at a = x λx gives H H/λ 2 scale invariance Tr T= 0 pressure p = 2ɛ/3 Ho 04 bulk viscosity ζ = 0 Son 07 ground state p( ) = ξ p (0) F Bertsch-parameter ξ determines cloud size in a trap R T F = R (0) T F ξ1/4 universal numbers ξ 0.36, T c 0.16 T F, 0 0.46 ɛ F transport: shear viscosity η(t c ) 0.5 n Shuryak 04
6 Many-body theory pseudopotential V (x) = ḡ(λ) δ(x) Luttinger/Ward 60 Ω = T ln Z = Ω[Ĝ] ( Ω[Ĝ] = β 1 1 2Tr{ ln Ĝ + [Ĝ 1 0 Ĝ 1]} Φ[Ĝ]) Ladder-approximation 3 l 1 2 l 1 δω[ĝ]/δĝ = 0 variational principle for G(k, τ) and F(k, τ) Haussmann/Rantner/Cerrito/Zw. 07, PR A75, 023610
7 why does Luttinger-Ward work well? it is conserving all th. dyn. relations are obeyed it obeys the Tan relations ( ) L E = L[ψ σ ] + L[Φ] + g Φ B ψ ψ + h.c. change of Ω with scattering length G 1 B,0 = Tr G B ( 1/a) = Ω ( 1/a) = G B (X, X ) g 2 m X,X 4π 2δ X,X = 2 C 4πm
pressure as a function of T/T F and 1/k F a (ξ = 0.36) 8
low temperatures, the l m/e F saturates to the internalenergye and (T )>E(0) = 3 5 N xe F = hereducedquantities 5 F 3 NE F ¼ 5 m 3 E F 2 3 p (Fig. wer bounds for x (29). f these three curves and ror due to the effective x =0.376(4).Theunresonance is expected 13). This value is conound x <0.383(1)from )fromaself-consistent and agrees with x = expansion (31). It lies 0.44(2)(32) andx = comparison with experiments equantummontecarlo pper bounds on x. Our everal less accurate ex- (6) butdisagreeswith l value 0.415(10) that pressure in (12). ure, and chemical pontropy S = 1 T (E + PV per particle S=Nk B ¼ n of T/T F (Fig. 3B). At A lose to the entropy of same T/T F.AboveT c, s nowhere small comspecificheatc V is not hase. This shows that c cannot be described in iquid picture, although antities agree surprisation for a Fermi liquid about T/T F =0.17,the l off compared with that deviate from a previous experimental determination of the pressure EoS (12) thatwascalibrated with an independently measured value of µ/e F, E/E 0, F/E 0 0.7 0.6 0.5 ξ n 0.4 ξ 0.3 0.2 0.0 A 4.5 B 0.1 0.2 T/T F 0.3 0.4 0.5 B S/Nk B ( P 0 (µ, T ) = k BT x =0.415(10)(35) anddisagreewiththeenergy measurement in (11)that used a thermometry inconsistent with the Virial expansion (10). Around 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Fig. 3. (A)Chemicalpotentialm,energyE,andfreeenergyF of the unitary Fermi gas versus T/T F. m (red solid circles) is normalized by the Fermi energy E F,andE (black solid circle) and F (green solid circle) are normalized by E 0 = 3 5 NE F.Athightemperatures,allquantitiesapproximatelytrackthoseforanoninteracting Fermi gas, shifted by x n 1(dashedcurves).Thepeakinthechemicalpotentialsignalsthe onset of superfluidity. In the deeply superfluid regime at low temperatures, m/e F, E/E 0,andF/F 0 all approach x (blue dashed line). (B) Entropyperparticle.Athightemperatures,theentropycloselytracksthatofa noninteracting Fermi gas (black solid curve). The open squares are from the self-consistent T-matrix calculation (23). A few representative error bars are shown, representing mean T SD. 4.0 3.5 3.0 0.2 0.4 T/T F 0.6 λ 3 T ded from www.sciencemag.org on February 8, 2012 f 5/2 (z) MIT ) Ku,.. Zwierlein Science 335 p. 563 (2012) T c /T F 0.16 at (µ/k B T ) c 2.5 theory Haussmann/Rantner/Cerrito/Zw. PR A75 (2007) exact LW theory: bold diagrammatic MC van Houcke et al 2012 9
Momentum resolved rf-spectroscopy measures hole spectral function A (k, ε k ω) Stewart,Gaebler,Jin 08 A(k, ε) from G(k, τ) via G(k, ω n ) = dε A(k, ε) i ω n + ε µ (Maxent) numerical spectral functions A(k, ε) at T = 0 (PR A80 09) (k F a) 1 = 1 unitarity (k F a) 1 = +1 10
II) The unitary gas as a perfect fluid (Kovtun Son Star. 05) AdS/CFT N = 4 SSYM-Theory in the t Hooft limit λ = g 2 N is equivalent to a classical theory of gravity AdS-metric ds 2 = L2 z 2 ( dt 2 + dx 2 + dz 2) L l P = λ 1/4 radial coord. z is effectively an RG-scale (McGreevy 09) Conjecture: All (relativistic, scale invariant) fluids have η s 4πk B 11
viscosity for helium, 12 4π η h s 200 150 Helium 0.1MPa Nitrogen 10MPa Water 100MPa 100 50 Viscosity bound 0 1 10 100 1000 T, K
13 Why does string theory apply to water? assume a Lennard-Jones fluid V (r) = 4ε [ (σ/r) 12 (σ/r) 6] reduced density n = nσ 3 and temp. T = k B T/ε critical point at n c = 0.36 and T c = 1.36 time scale for classical dynamics τ = mσ 2 /ε dim. analysis η LJ = ετ σ 3 η (n, T ) ηlj min = const mε σ 2 quantum viscosity η min = α η n with α η = const/λ DB O(1) because the de Boer par. Λ DB = /σ mε cannot be 1!
measurements of viscosity and spin diffusion of the unitary gas 10 Luttinger-Ward theory Sommer et al. (2011) classical gas md s / h 1 0.1 1 10 T/T F Cao... Science 331 (2011) and Sommer... Nature 472 (2011) 14
shear viscosity of the unitary gas Boltzmann-limit η(t T F ) = 2.8 n(t/t F ) 3/2 = 4.2 λ 3 T (density drops out!), well defined quasipart. /τ η k B T superfluid below T c 0.16 T F has finite viscosity due to a) phonon interactions: η(t ) T 5 as T T c Rupak/Schäfer 07 b) fermionic qp s: η(t ) const as T 0 Pethick/Smith 75 T T c inaccessible since mean free path trap size 15
16 transport coefficients of the unitary gas from Luttinger-Ward Kubo formula Re η(ω) = Im χret xy (ω) ω perturbation Ĥ = h l (t) ˆΠ l (l = 0, 2 bulk, shear) euclidean time τ χ l (τ) = d 3 x T ˆΠ l (x, τ)ˆπ l (0, 0) from δ 2 Ω χ l (τ) = δh l (τ)δh l (0) h=0 χ xy (iω m ) requires contin. to real frequencies ω (Pade, Ansatz) spin diffusion (l = 1) minimum value D s 1.3 /m near T = 0.5 T F
17 Ward-identities due to scale and translation inv. guarantee that ζ(ω) 0 sum rule 2 π [ dω Re η(ω) 0 Boltzmann-limit η 4.2 λ 3 T 3/2 C 15π mω ] p T 3/2 ; D s 1.1 /m (T/T F ) 3/2 η(ω) [hbar n] 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 T=10 T= 5 T= 2 T= 1 T=0.5 T=0.151 /s [ h / k B ] 20 10 5 2 1 phonon classical full Kubo 0.001 0.5 0.0001 0.1 1 10 100 1000 ω [E F ] 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 T [T F ]
18 III) Efimov physics beyond universality Schmidt, Rath, Zw. 12 Bosons form trimers at a (n) < 0 universality a(n+1) /a (n) 22.69... 0.0 scale in (a, E) plane set by - 0.5 three-body parameter - 1.0-1.5-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0-0.5-1.0-1.5-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 exp. observation a 9.45 l vdw for the first Efimov trimer Feshbach coupling Ĥ = g 2 χ(r 2 r 1 )φ( r 1 + r 2 )ψ (r 1 )ψ (r 2 ) 2 with finite range χ(r) exp r/ā ā = mean scatt. length
19 exact solution of RG-flow for atom-dimer vertex λ (k) 3 (q 1, q 2 ; E) poles of λ (k=0) 3 give Efimov spectrum which is fixed by ā and the dimensionless resonance strength s res = 0.956 l vdw /r 0.2 0.1 crossover from open-channel dominated limit s res 1 to 0.0-0.1 s res 1 where a = 10.3 r - 3-2 - 1 0 1 2 3 (Petrov 04, Gogolin... 08) non-universal ratios a (1) /a = 17.1 exp. 19.7 O Hara Jochim 09
20 The unitary gas is a benchmark for many-body physics. It realizes a high-temperature fermionic superfluid T c /T F 0.16 and a scale-invariant many-body problem with universal ratios p/p F = ξ 0.37 and S/Nk B c 0.7 is the most perfect non-relativistic fluid with η/s close to the KSS bound and quantum-limited spin-diffusion D s 1.3 /m The Efimov spectrum for cold atoms is fixed by l vdw and r in the absence of 3-body forces