Ökoszisztéma szolgáltatás a globális szakpolitikában (IPBES) - koncepció, feladatok, és magyar részvétel. Báldi András

Átírás

1 Ökoszisztéma szolgáltatás a globális szakpolitikában (IPBES) - koncepció, feladatok, és magyar részvétel Báldi András

2

3 Ökoszisztéma szolgáltatás Az emberiség haszna az ökoszisztémák nyújtotta sokféle forrásból és szolgáltatásból. Hazonelvű, emberközpontú, önző. Szükséges lépés a biodiverzitás értékének megértetéséhez a társadalom számára.

4 Search in Web of Science for: "ecosystem service*" Published Items in Each Year Citations in Each Year

5 Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

6 What do we want an IPBES for? Since 1988, the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has brought about a scientific consensus on the reality and significance of global warming, which many experts initially refused to admit. We need a similar type of mechanism for biodiversity. Jacques Chirac, January 2005

7 And how does it fit in the existing landscape?

8 What will IPBES do? Goal of IPBES To strengthen the science-policy interface for biodiversity and ecosystem services for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, long-term human wellbeing and sustainable development Panama, April 2012

9 Ecosystem services in the policy IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPBES Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services 1988, UN (WMO, UNEP) 2006 Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change (+1% GDP now, or -20% loss later) 2007 Nobel prize scientific and indigenous knowledge to be translated into specific policy action UN GA 2010 January 2013, Bonn first plenary meeting

10 intergovernmental -?? kutatás és gyakorlat közötti szakadék áthidalása IPBES alapvetően más ami itt készül, az már jogi dokumentum más világ : minden anyag a plenárisé adopt, approve, accept politikai játszmák (jelölések) kutatónak csönd útlevél

11

12

13

14 United Nations Regional Groups: African Group Asia-Pacific Group Eastern European Group Latin American and Caribbean Group Western European and Others Group

15 10 fő 25 fő

16

17 Georgina Mace 3 diája alapján:

18

19

20 Global IPBES level of resolution IPBES Scope Interacting across spatial scales Good quality of life Human wellbeing 8 Living in harmony with nature Living-well in balance and harmony with Mother Earth Ability to achieve a life that people value i. a. food, water, energy and livelihood security; health, social relationships, equity, spirituality, cultural identity Nature s benefits to people Ecosystem goods and services (Provisioning, regulating, cultural) Nature s gifts 6 7 Anthropogenic assets Built, human, social, financial 5 Institutions and governance and other indirect drivers Socio-politic, economic, technological, cultural 2 Direct drivers Natural drivers Anthropogenic drivers Habitat conversion, exploitation, climate change, pollution, species introductions National 3 Nature Biodiversity and ecosystems 4 Mother Earth Systems of life Evolution, biocultural diversity Non-living natural resources Intrinsic values Local Changing over time Baseline Trends Scenarios

21

22 IPBES Four main functions 1. Knowledge generation 2. Regular and timely assessments 3. Support policy formulation and implementation 4. Capacity building Initial work programme ( ) MEP állította össze a kormányok és más stakeholderek igényei alapján

23 IPBES 3 1(a) Priority capacity building needs matched with resources 1(b) Capaci es needed to implement the Pla orm work programme 1 2 1(c) Principles and procedures for working with ILK systems 1(d) Priority knowledge and data needs addressed 2(a) Guide 2(b) Regional/Sub-regional assessments 2(c) Global assessment 3(a) FTA pollina on/food produc on 3(b)(i) Thema c assessment on land degrada on and restora on 3(b)(ii) Thema c assessment on invasive alien species 3(b)(iii) Thema c assessment on sustainable use 3 4 3(c) Policy support tools and methodologies on scenarios and modeling 5 6 3(d) Policy support tools and methodologies on value, valua on and accoun ng 4(a) Catalogue of assessments 4(a)bis Data Management Plan 7 4(b) Catalogue of policy support tools and methodologies 4(c) Communica on, outreach and engagement 4(d) Review of effec veness and guidance IPBES 4 IPBES 5 IPBES 6 IPBES 7 Scoping Phase Assessment Phase Tool development Phase

24 IPBES magyar jelentőség IPCC AR5: 838 szerző, 3,5 magyar Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005: 1300 szerző, 0,5 magyar IPBES: 2 MEP tag, 3 task force és 7 expert group mindegyikében van magyar (Regional scoping meeting c. 80 fő 6 magyar)

25 IPBES 3 1(a) Priority capacity building needs matched with resources IPBES 4 IPBES 5 IPBES 6 IPBES 7 1(b) Capaci es needed to implement the Pla orm work programme 1 2 1(c) Principles and procedures for working with ILK systems 1(d) Priority knowledge and data needs addressed 2(a) Guide 2(b) Regional/Sub-regional assessments Bela Györgyi Molnár Zsolt Horváth Ferenc, BA Lengyel Szabolcs, BA Zlinszky, Benedek, Lengyel, KertészÁdám, BA, PGy 3(a) FTA pollina on/food produc on 2(c) Global assessment 3(b)(i) Thema c assessment on land degrada on and restora on 3(b)(ii) Thema c assessment on invasive alien species 3(b)(iii) Thema c assessment on sustainable use 3 4 3(c) Policy support tools and methodologies on scenarios and modeling 5 6 3(d) Policy support tools and methodologies on value, valua on and accoun ng 4(a) Catalogue of assessments Kovács-Hostyánszki Anikó, BA Török Kati Benedek Zsófi Pataki György, co-chair, Kelemen Eszter 4(a)bis Data Management Plan 7 4(b) Catalogue of policy support tools and methodologies Podmaniczky László 4(c) Communica on, outreach and engagement 4(d) Review of effec veness and guidance Scoping Phase Assessment Phase Tool development Phase

26