Irodalomjegyzék Aldrich, John H. Rohde, David W. 1995. Theories of the Party in the Legislature and the Transition to Republican Rule in the House. Working Paper series 5. Political Institution and Public Choice, Michigan State University. Andeweg, Rudy B. Thomassen, Jacques J. A. 2005. Modes of Political Representation. Toward a New Typology. Legislative Studies Quarterly 4. 507 528. APSA Committee on Political Parties 1950. Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System. New York: Rinehart. Artés, Joaquín Bustos, Antonio 2008. Electoral Promises and Minority Governments: An Empirical Study. European Journal of Political Research 3. 307 333. Ashworth, Rachel E. 2000. Party Manifestos and Local Accountability: A Content Analysis of Local Election Pledges in Wales. Local Government Studies 3. 11 30. Barber, Benjamin 1984. Strong Democracy. Berkeley Los Angeles London: University of California Press. Baumgartner, Frank R. Jones, Bryan D. Wilkerson, John 2011. Comparative Studies of Policy Dynamics. Comparative Political Studies 8. 947 972. Beck László Bíró Nagy András Róna Dániel 2011. Szabadesésben. Az MSZP 2006 2010 közötti népszerűségvesztésének politikai napirendi magyarázatai. In Enyedi Zsolt Szabó Andrea Tardos Róbert (szerk.): Új képlet. A 2010-es választások Magyarországon. Budapest: DKMKA Századvég. 193 216. Béland, Daniel Cox, Robert Henry (eds.) 2011. Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Birch, Anthony H. 1964. Representative and Responsible Government. London: Unwin. Bíró Nagy András 2011. Az új pártrendszer térképe. Programok, pártelitek és szavazótáborok a 2010-es választások után. In Sándor Péter (szerk.): Magyarország Politikai Évkönyve 2010-ről (DVD-kiadás). Budapest: DKMKA. Braun, Dietmar Gilardi, Fabrizio (eds.) 2006. Delegation in Contemporary Democracies. London New York: Routledge. Brooks, Joel E. 1990. The Opinion-Policy Nexus in Germany. The Public Opinion Quarterly 4. 508 529. Budge, Ian 2001. Validating Party Policy Placements. British Journal of Political Science 1. 210 223. Budge, Ian Farlie, Dennis 1983. Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies. London Boston: Allen & Unwin. Budge, Ian Hofferbert, Richard I. 1990. Mandates and Policy Outputs: U.S. Party Platforms and Federal Expenditures. American Political Science Review I. 111 131. Budge, Ian Hofferbert, Richard I. 1992. The Party Mandate and the Westminster Model: Election Programmes and Government Spending in Britain, 1948-85. British Journal of Political Science 2. 151 182.
211 Budge, Ian Klingemann, Hans-Dieter Volkens, Andrea Bara, Judith Tanenbaum, Eric 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences, Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments, 1945-1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Costello, Rory Thomson, Robert 2008. Election Pledges and Their Enactment in Coalition Governments: A Comparative Analysis of Ireland. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 3. 239 256. Cox, Gary W. McCubbins, Mathew D. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dahl, Robert 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago London: The University of Chicago Press. Dahl, Robert 1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven London: Yale University Press. Dahl, Robert 1990. Myth of the Presidential Mandate. Political Science Quarterly 3. 355 372. Dryzek, John S. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Enyedi Zsolt Kenneth Benoit 2011. Kritikus választás 2010. A magyar pártrendszer átrendeződése a bal-jobb dimenzióban. In Enyedi Zsolt Szabó Andrea Tardos Róbert (szerk.): Új képlet. A 2010-es választások Magyarországon. Budapest: DKMKA Századvég. 17 42. Fearon, James D. 1999. Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance. In Przeworski, Adam Stokes, Susan C. Manin, Bernard (eds.): Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 55 97. Finer, Samuel E. 1975. Manifesto Moonshine. New Society 13 November. 379 380. Fishkin, James 1991. Deliberative Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Fitzsimmons, Michael P. 2002. The Remaking of France: The National Assembly and the Constitution of 1791. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Flynn, Greg 2011. Rethinking Policy Capacity in Canada: The Role of Parties and Election Platforms in Government Policy-Making. Canadian Public Administration Administration Publique Du Canada 2. 235 253. Frognier, André-Paul 2000. The Normative Foundations of Party Government. In Blondel, Jean Cotta, Maurizio (eds.): The Nature of Party Government: A Comparative European Perspective. London: Palgrave. 21 38. Gofas, Andreas Hay, Colin (eds.) 2010. The Role of Ideas in Political Analysis. A portrait of Contemporary Debates. London New York: Routledge. Grossback, Lawrence J. Peterson, David A. M. Stimson, James A. 2005. Comparing Competing Theories on the Causes of Mandate Perceptions. American Journal of Political Science 2. 406 419. Grossback, Lawrence J. Peterson, David A. M. Stimson, James A. 2007. Mandate Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Harmel, Robert 2011. The How s and Why s of Party Manifestos: Some Thoughts for a Cross-National Research Agenda. Paper prepared for discussion at the Workshop on Why and How of Party Manifestos in New and in Established Democracies, ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, St. Gallen, Switzerland, 12 17 April, 2011. Hershey, Marjorie Randon 1994. The Meaning of a Mandate: Interpretations of Mandate in 1984 Presidential Election Coverage. Polity 2. 225 254. Hindmoor, Andrew 2004. New Labour at the Centre. Constructing Political Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hobolt, Sara Binzer Klemmensen, Robert 2005. Responsive Government? Public Opinion and Government Policy Preferences in Britain and Denmark. Political Studies 6. 379 402.
212 Irodalomjegyzék Horn Gábor 2003. Gondolatok az SZDSZ választási kampányáról, annak következményeiről. In Kurtán Sándor Sándor Péter Vass László (szerk.): Magyarország politikai évkönyve 2002- ről. Budapest: DKMKA. 1305 1309. http://staatswissenschaft.univie.ac.at/filead min/user_up - load/inst_staatswissenschaften/scherman_k/paper_linking_election_pledges_to_policy_out come_s5pn24.pdf Jacobs, Lawrence R. Shapiro, Robert Y. 1994. Studying Substantive Democracy. Political Science and Politics 1. 9 17. Judge, David 1999. Representation. Theory and Practice in Britain. London New York: Routledge. Kalogeropoulou, Efthalia 1989. Election Promises and Government Performance in Greece: PA- SOK s Fulfilment of its 1981 Election Pledges. European Journal of Political Research 3. 289 311. Karácsony Gergely 2006. Árkok és légvárak. A választói viselkedés stabilizálódása Magyarországon. In Karácsony Gergely (szerk.): Parlamenti választás, 2006. Budapest: DKMKA. 59 104. Kelley, Stanley 1983. Interpreting Elections. Princeton: Princeton University Press. King, Gary Laver, Michael Hofferbert, Richard I. Budge, Ian McDonald, Michael D. 1993. Party Platforms, Mandates, and Government Spending. The American Political Science Review 3. 744 750. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter Hofferbert, Richard I. Budge, Ian 1994. Parties, Policies and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Körösényi András 2006. Elszámoltatható-e a kormány? Képviselet, demokrácia és a 2006. évi választások. In Karácsony Gergely (szerk.): Parlamenti választás 2006. Elemzések és adatok. Budapest: DKMKA Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem Politikatudományi Intézet. 253 292. Körösényi András 2007a. Politikai vezetés: a klasszikus demokrácia és a paternalizmus között. Racionalizmus és szkepticizmus a demokráciaelméletben. Századvég 3. 3 35. Körösényi András 2007b. A demokratikus elitizmus konszenzusán túl. Politikatudományi Szemle 4. 7 28. Körösényi András 2008. A felhatalmazáselmélet védelmében. Válasz Meszerics Tamás kritikájára. Politikatudományi Szemle 4. 161 172. Körösényi András 2009. Beyond the Happy Consensus about Democratic Elitism. Comparative Sociology 3. 364 382. (Magyarul: A demokratikus elitizmus konszenzusán túl. Politikatudományi Szemle 2007/4. 7 28.) Körösényi András 2012. Politikai polarizáció és következményei a demokratikus elszámoltatásra. Magyar politika, 1990 2010. Working Papers in Political Science sorozat 1. MTA TK Politikatudományi Intézet. Krehbiel, Keith 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Krippendorff, Klaus 1980. Content Analysis. An Introduction to Its Methodology. London: Sage Publications. Laver, Michael Budge, Ian (eds.) 1992. Party Policy and Government Coalitions. London: Macmillan. Lewin, Leif 2007. Democratic Accountability: Why Choice in Politics Is Both Possible and Necessary. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Manin, Bernard 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Manin, Bernard Przeworski, Adam Stokes, Susan C. 1999a. Introduction. In Przeworski, Adam Stokes, Susan C. Manin, Bernard (eds.): Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1 26. Manin, Bernard Przeworski, Adam Stokes, Susan C. 1999b. Elections and Representation. In Przeworski, Adam Stokes, Susan C. Manin, Bernard (eds.): Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 29 54.
Irodalomjegyzék 213 Mansbridge, Jane. 2008. A Selection Model of Political Representation. KSG Working Paper series February. Harvard University. Mansergh, Lucy Thomson, Robert 2007. Elections Pledges, Party Competition, and Policymaking. Comparative Politics 3. 311 329. McDonald Michael. D. Budge, Ian 2005. Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Meszerics Tamás 2008. Demokratikus-e a felhatalmazáselmélet? Megjegyzések Körösényi András tanulmányához. Politikatudományi Szemle 4. 147 159. Moury, Catherine 2011. Italian Coalitions and Electoral Promises: Assessing the Democratic Performance of the Prodi I and Berlusconi II Governments. Modern Italy 1. 35 50. Naurin, Elin 2011. Election Promises, Party Behaviour and Voter Perceptions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Neuendorf, Kimberly A. 2002. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Noel, Hans 2010. Methodological Issues in the Study of Political Parties. In Maisel, L. Sandy Berry, Jeffrey M. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Page, I. Benjamin Shapiro, Y. Robert 1983. Effects of Public Opinion on Policy. The American Political Science Review 1. 175 190. Pasquino, Pasquale 2001. One and Three: Separation of Powers and the Independence of the Judiciary in the Italian Constitution. In Ferejohn, John Rakove, Jack N. Riley, Jonathan (eds.): Constitutional Culture and Democratic Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 205 222. Pennings, Paul 2005. Parties, Voters and Policy Priorities in the Netherlands, 1971 2002. Party Politics 1. 29 45. Peterson, David A. M. Grossback, Lawrence J. Stimson, James A. Gangl, Amy 2003. Congressinal Response to Mandate Elections. American Journal of Political Science 3. 411 426. Pethő András 2009. Így tették lejtőre Magyarországot I. rész. Az ígéretözön és előzményei. http://www.origo.hu/itthon/20090717-igy-tettek-lejtore-magyarorszagot-i-resz-a-szaznaposprogram.html. Pétry, François 1988. The Policy Impact of Canadian Party Programs: Public Expenditure Growth and Contagion from the Left. Canadian Public Policy 4. 376 389. Pétry, François 1991. Fragile Mandate: Party Programmes and Public Expenditures in the French Fifth Republic. European Journal of Political Research 2. 149 171. Pétry, Francois 1995. The Party Agenda Model. Election Programmes and Government Spending in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science 1. 51 84. Pétry, Francois Collette, Benoit 2006. Le gouvernement Charest a-t-il respecté ses promesses? In Petry, Francois Bélanger, Éric Imbeau, Louis M. (eds.): Le Parti libéral. Enquête sur les réa lisations du gouvernement Charest. Québec: Presses de l Université Laval. 83 101. Pétry, Francois Collette, Benoit 2007. Measuring How Political Parties Keep Their Promises (manuscript). http://www.poltext.capp.ulaval.ca/upload/fichier180.pdf. Pétry, François Collette, Benoit 2009. Measuring How Political Parties Keep Their Promises. A Positive Perspective from Political Science. In Imbeau, Louis M. (ed.): Do They Walk as They Talk? Speech and Action in Policy Processes. Springer: New York. 65 80. Pitkin, Hanna 1967. The Concept of Representation. University of California Press. Pomper, Gerald Lederman, Susan 1980. Elections in America. New York: Longman. Przeworski, Adam Stokes, Susan C. Manin, Bernard (eds.) 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pulzer, Peter G. J. 1975. Political Representation and Elections in Britain. London: George Allen & Unwin.
214 Irodalomjegyzék Rallings, Colin 1987. The Influence of Election Programmes: Britain and Canada, 1945-1979. In Budge, Ian Robertson, David Hearl, Derek (eds.): Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-war Election Programmes in 19 Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1 14. Ranney, Austin. 1954. The Doctrine of Responsible Party Government: Its Origins and Present State. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Riker, William H. 1996. The Strategy of Rhetoric. Campaigning for the American Constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press. Robertson, David 1976. A Theory of Party Competition. London New York: John Wiley and Sons. Rose, Richard 1984. Do Parties Make a Difference? Chatham, Mass.: Chatham House Publishers. Rousseau, Jean Jacques. 1985. The Government of Poland. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing. Royed, Terry J. 1996. Testing the Mandate Model in Britain and the United States: Evidence from the Reagan and Thatcher Eras. British Journal of Political Science 1. 45 80. Royed, Terry J. Borelli, Stephen A. 1997. Political Parties and Public Policy: Social Welfare Policy from Carter to Bush. Polity 4. 539 563. Royed, Terry J. Borelli, Stephen A. 1999. Parties and Economic Policy in the USA: Pledges and Performance, 1976-1992. Party Politics 1. 115 127. Schattschneider, E. Elmer 1942. Party Government. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston. Schermann Ennser-Jedenastik 2012. Linking Election Pledges to Policy Outcomes: The Austrian Case. Paper Prepared for the 4th ECPR Graduate Conference at Jacobs University, July 4-6, 2012, Bremen. Sebők Miklós 2007. A választási ígéretek politikaelmélete. A mandátumelmélet és korlátai. Századvég 3. 37 60. Shamir, Michal Shamir, Jacob Sheafer, Tamir 2008. The Political Communication of Mandate Elections. Political Communication 1. 47 66. Strøm, Kaare Müller, Wolfgang C. Bergman, Torbjörn (eds.) 2003. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sundquist, James L. 1988. Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States. Political Science Quarterly 4. 613 635. Szántó Zoltán 2009. Kontraszelekció és erkölcsi kockázat a politikában. Vázlat az információs aszimmetria közgazdaságtani fogalmainak politikatudományi alkalmazhatóságáról. Közgazdasági Szemle június. 563 571. TÁRKI 2001. Elemzések a gazdasági és társadalompolitikai döntések előkészítéséhez. November. Budapest: TÁRKI. http://www.tarki.hu/adatbank-h/kutjel/pdf/a071.pdf. TÁRKI 2002. Elemzések a gazdasági és társadalompolitikai döntések előkészítéséhez. Március. Budapest: TÁRKI. http://www.tarki.hu/adatbank-h/kutjel/pdf/a099.pdf. Thome, Helmut 1999. Party Mandate Theory and Time-Series Analysis. A Methodological Comment. Electoral Studies 4. 569 585. Thomson, Robert 2001. The Programme to Policy Linkage: The Fulfilment of Election Pledges on Socio-Economic Policy in the Netherland, 1986-1998. European Journal of Political Research 2. 171 197. Thomson, Robert Royed, Terry Naurin, Elin 2010. The Program-to-Policy Linkage: A Comparative Study of Election Pledges and Government Policies in the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Ireland. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC., USA, September 2-5.
Irodalomjegyzék 215 Tóka Gábor 2005a. A magyarországi politikai tagoltság nemzetközi összehasonlításban. In Angelusz Róbert Tardos Róbert (szerk.): Törések, hálók, hidak. Választói magatartás és politikai tagolódás Magyarországon. Budapest: DKMKA. 17 63. Tóka Gábor 2005b. A törésvonalak, a pártok és az intézményrendszer. In Angelusz Róbert Tardos Róbert (szerk.): Törések, hálók, hidak. Választói magatartás és politikai tagolódás Magyarországon. Budapest: DKMKA. 243 321. Tsebelis, George 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Urbinati, Naida 2006. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Williams, Richard 2006. Generalized Ordered Logit/Partial Proportional Odds Models for Ordinal Dependent Variables. The Stata Journal 1. 58 82.